Herring River Restoration Project

Sediment science

Throughout the history of the Herring River Restoration Project, shellfishermen have been concerned about the possible adverse effects of the project on their livelihood – apprehension that restored tidal flow would cause silt to smother shellfish beds in Wellfleet Harbor.

The physics of sedimentation would predict that silt suspended on an outgoing ebb tide might settle in Wellfleet Harbor. Two scientific articles support that prediction: The first article above discusses the flow of fine sediment downstream:

The article presents a simulation model of the tidal channels of a New Zealand harbor (pictured below) in which most of the sediment flow is ebb-tide dominant, while only a small fraction is flood-tide dominant. The brown color in the image indicates ebb-tide dominance, while the black indicates flood-tide dominance. White areas are intertidal sandbanks. The model shows that there was net seaward transport almost everywhere except in the short side arms of main channels.

The second article contains the following image that should lay to rest the misconception that all sediment flow in rivers is flood-dominant and that fine sediment is unlikely to flow downstream:

Sediment transported down the Rhone River into Lake Geneva

(Photo Credit: Rama, 2007, via Wikimedia)

These scientific articles make it clear that silt flows downstream on ebb tides, justifying concerns that this phenomenon could threaten shellfish beds in Wellfleet Harbor when tidal flows are restored to the Herring River.


Return to Sedimentation studies
Return to Flood dominant?
Return to Editorial
Return to Oysters & Silt
Top of page